<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RFC 5870: &#8220;A Uniform Resource Identifier for Geographic Locations&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://geouri.org/2010/06/07/rfc-5870-geo-uri/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://geouri.org/2010/06/07/rfc-5870-geo-uri/</link>
	<description>a Uniform Resource Identifier for geographic locations</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 20:43:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://geouri.org/2010/06/07/rfc-5870-geo-uri/comment-page-1/#comment-6330</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 09:48:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geouri.org/?p=29#comment-6330</guid>
		<description>Hello Ivanildo,

from the IETF perspective, this document is finished, and &quot;done&quot;. Hence, there are no changes possible to the document anymore (there was a 3-year review and discussion period before it was published). However, there are still two options to discuss your comments:

1) You can send your comments in email to the GEOPRIV working group discussion list (geopriv@ietf.org) - If you want, you can also send me the comments privately, i would be very interested in them.

2) You can - if you think the document contains major flaws - submit an &quot;Errata&quot; to the RFC Editors - this is described here:

http://www.rfc-editor.org/how_to_report.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Ivanildo,</p>
<p>from the IETF perspective, this document is finished, and &#8220;done&#8221;. Hence, there are no changes possible to the document anymore (there was a 3-year review and discussion period before it was published). However, there are still two options to discuss your comments:</p>
<p>1) You can send your comments in email to the GEOPRIV working group discussion list (geopriv@ietf.org) &#8211; If you want, you can also send me the comments privately, i would be very interested in them.</p>
<p>2) You can &#8211; if you think the document contains major flaws &#8211; submit an &#8220;Errata&#8221; to the RFC Editors &#8211; this is described here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/how_to_report.html" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/comment/www.rfc-editor.org');">http://www.rfc-editor.org/how_to_report.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ivanildo</title>
		<link>http://geouri.org/2010/06/07/rfc-5870-geo-uri/comment-page-1/#comment-6329</link>
		<dc:creator>Ivanildo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 20:34:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geouri.org/?p=29#comment-6329</guid>
		<description>As a Surveying Engineer, I have a lot of comments to do, due to serious concepts mismatches. How can I submit the comments to fix and enhance this document?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a Surveying Engineer, I have a lot of comments to do, due to serious concepts mismatches. How can I submit the comments to fix and enhance this document?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Mabbett</title>
		<link>http://geouri.org/2010/06/07/rfc-5870-geo-uri/comment-page-1/#comment-6284</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Mabbett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 14:03:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geouri.org/?p=29#comment-6284</guid>
		<description>Wikipedia article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geo_URI

Please feel free to improve it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wikipedia article: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geo_URI" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/comment/en.wikipedia.org');">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geo_URI</a></p>
<p>Please feel free to improve it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alex</title>
		<link>http://geouri.org/2010/06/07/rfc-5870-geo-uri/comment-page-1/#comment-6281</link>
		<dc:creator>alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 18:37:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geouri.org/?p=29#comment-6281</guid>
		<description>Stéphane,

yes, i plan to do so. I will actually re-implement it from scratch when i have time. Unless someone else does integrate support for the URI scheme into Firefox&#039; main source ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stéphane,</p>
<p>yes, i plan to do so. I will actually re-implement it from scratch when i have time. Unless someone else does integrate support for the URI scheme into Firefox&#8217; main source <img src='http://geouri.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stéphane Bortzmeyer</title>
		<link>http://geouri.org/2010/06/07/rfc-5870-geo-uri/comment-page-1/#comment-6280</link>
		<dc:creator>Stéphane Bortzmeyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 18:29:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geouri.org/?p=29#comment-6280</guid>
		<description>Do you plan to upgrade the Firefox extension,which no longer works with recent (3.0.6) Firefoxes?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you plan to upgrade the Firefox extension,which no longer works with recent (3.0.6) Firefoxes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

